Integration Of Technology In Problem-Based Learning To Improve Students Computational Thinking: Implementation On Polymer Topics

Authors

  • Nurasiah Departement of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Sciences, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Maria Paristiowati Departement of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Sciences, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Erdawati Departement of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Sciences, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Afrizal Departement of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Sciences, Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v4i2.280

Keywords:

Computational Thinking, Polymer

Abstract

This research is motivated by the importance of developing computational thinking skills for students in facing the challenges of the 21st century. Computational thinking is described as a thinking process in formulating problems and solving problems computationally through computers, humans or machines. Its skills can be measured during the learning process of students with the approach of basic computational thinking strategies as follows: Are students able to decompose complex problems into simpler problems? (Decomposition), can students create problem patterns? (Pattern recognition), are students able to focus on issues that are considered important? (Abstraction), and whether students can solve problems systematically (Algorithm) with SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, time-based). The research aims to improve students' computational thinking skills through the integration of technology in problem-based learning models on polymer topics. This study uses a quasi-experimental quantitative method with none equivalent control group design. The subjects in this study were students of SMAN 1 South Tangerang City, totaling 66 students of class XII. The results showed that the computational thinking skills of students increased after the implementation of the problem-based learning model integrated with technology. This is indicated by the average N-Gain Score for the experimental class which is 56.65%, which is included in the quite effective category, and based on the independent sample t-test. The Sig value is obtained. (2-tailed) 0.007. This indicates Sig. (2-tailed) <, it can be concluded that there is a significant positive effect of the use of technology integration in the problem-based learning model on polymer topics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cansu, et al. (2019). An Overview of Computational Thinking. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools. Vol. 3, No. 1

Chang, Y., & Peterson, L. (2018). Pre-service teachers' perceptions of computational thinking. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 26(3), 353–374.

Chen, G. (2017). Programming language teaching model based on computational thinking and problem-based learning. Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Seminar on Education Innovation and Economic Management (SEIEM 2017).

Falcão, T. P., & de França, R. S. (2021). Computational Thinking Goes to School: Implications for Teacher Education in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Informática Na Educação, 29, 1158–1177.

ISTE (2011). Operational definitions of computational thinking. retrieved 24.12.2017 from: https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.csteachers.org/resource/resmgr/CompThinkingFlyer.pdf

ISTE(2016). ISTE Standarts for Students, retrieved 24.12.2017 from: http://www.iste.org/docs/StandardsResources/iste-standards_students-2016_one-sheet_final.pdf?sfvrsn=0.23432948779836327

Jacob, S. R., & Warschauer, M. (2018). Computational thinking and literacy. Journal of Computer Science Integration, 1(1).

Kadarwati, Sri et al., (2020). Keefektifan Computational Thingking (CT) Dan Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dalam Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa Terhadap Penyelesaian Soal-Soal Cerita Materi Perbandingan (Skala Pada Peta) Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika Vol 7 No 1.

Kwon, Kyungbin et al. (2021). Integration of problem‑based learning in elementary computer science education: efects on computational thinking and attitudes. Association for Educational Communications and Technology. 69, pages2761–2787

Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2011). 21st Century Skills: Prepare Students for the Future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(3), 121–123.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575

Magno de Jesus, Â., & Silveira, I. F. (2021). Gamebased collaborative learning framework for computational thinking development. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia, 99, 113–123.

McNicholl, R. (2018). Computational thinking using code.org. Hello World, 4, 37.

Papert, S. (1980). "Mindstorms"Children. Computers and Powerful Ideas

Salam. (2022). A systemic review of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Computational Thinking (CT) in teaching and learning. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 5(2), 2022, 46-52

Sands, P., Yadav, A., & Good, J. (2018). Computational thinking in K-12: In-service teacher perceptions of computational thinking. In Computational thinking in the STEM disciplines (pp. 151–164). Springer

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Wing, J.M. (2006). Computational Thinking. CACM. Viewpoint. Vol. 49 (3); pp. 33-35. Chinese translation in Communications of CCF, vol. 3 no. 11, November 2007, pp. 83-85. French translation in Bulletin of Specif, translated by Pierre Lescanne, December 2008

Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), 1–16.

Yang, S., & Kwok, D. (2017). A study of students’ attitudes towards using ict in a social constructivist environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 50–62.

Zapata-Cáceres, M., Martín-Barroso, E., & Román-González, M. (2020). Computational thinking test for beginners: Design and content validation. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1905–1914.

Published

2023-02-21

How to Cite

Nurasiah, N., Paristiowati, M. ., Erdawati, E., & Afrizal, A. (2023). Integration Of Technology In Problem-Based Learning To Improve Students Computational Thinking: Implementation On Polymer Topics. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 4(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v4i2.280

Issue

Section

Articles