Product Development Strategy PT. Pindad in Improving the Indonesian Defence Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v4i4.345Keywords:
Defence Industry, Diplomacy, Independence.Abstract
PT. Pindad is an Indonesian Manufacturing Industry Company which is engaged in Military Products and Commercial Products. Activities of PT. Pindad covers Design and Development, Engineering, Assembling, and Fabrication and Maintenance. This company is the only BUMN (State Owned Enterprise) company in Indonesia that is engaged in the military. The purpose of this research is the product development of PT. Pindad for the development of the Indonesian defence industry uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method with a sectorial approach. The sectorial approach is focused on the activity sectors in PT. Pindad. Based on research results from data related to the Indonesian defence industry, there are 4 superior products of the defence industry, including rifles, munitions, personnel transportation vehicles / armoured vehicles and medium tanks. By knowing some of the leading sectors, it can be expected to be the basis for the formulation of the defence industry to be free from dependence on supply of weapons systems from other countries and also free to determine foreign policy without being influenced by foreign pressure. Therefore, the Indonesian defence industry must be maintained and developed to increase Indonesia's status in the eyes of the world and strengthen our foreign diplomacy, especially defence diplomacy
Downloads
References
C. L. Lee and W. Y. Wang, “Strategy, accountants’ activities and new product development performance,” Adv. Account., vol. 50, p. 100487, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.adiac.2020.100487.
T. Wicaksono and A. A. B. Perwita, “The Military Industrial Complex In a Developing Country: Lessons from the Republic of Turkey,” J. Hub. Int., vol. 9, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.18196/hi.91162.
R. Carril and M. Duggan, “The impact of industry consolidation on government procurement: Evidence from Department of Defense contracting,” J. Public Econ., vol. 184, p. 104141, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104141.
T. N. Habsari, “PT Pindad’s Strategy towards Defense Industry Independence,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Hum. Res., vol. 05, no. 02, pp. 666–673, 2022, doi: 10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i2-37.
B. Giersing et al., “Strategies for vaccine-product innovation: Creating an enabling environment for product development to uptake in low- and middle-income countries,” Vaccine, vol. 39, no. 49, pp. 7208–7219, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.091.
M. A. A. Shiddiqy, A. Bainus, W. S. Sumadinata, and A. Sudirman, “The development of the indonesian defence industry as a consequence of security dilemma and arms race in the Southeast Asian Region,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 214–226, 2019.
F. Triantama, “Kerjasama Pengembangan Medium Battle Tank Harimau Sebagai Perwujudan Ketahanan Alutsista Tentara Nasional Indonesia,” J. Ketahanan Nas., vol. 26, no. 2, p. 273, 2020, doi: 10.22146/jkn.56116.
S. A. Arsita, G. E. Saputro, and A. Sarjito, “Implementation of Trade-off, Local Component, and Offset Policy Pt. Pindad (Persero) in Supporting the Defense Economy,” J. Econ. Manag. Trade, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 42–52, 2021, doi: 10.9734/jemt/2021/v27i730355.
A. Prayitno, S. J. Raharja, E. Maulina, . R., and A. Muftiadi, “Multiple Managers, Competing Strategies and Business Unit Performance: A Case Study of PINDAD Company, Indonesia,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 105, pp. 51–64, 2017, doi: 10.14257/ijast.2017.105.05.
T. Ahmad D.P, Y. Martinus Pasaribu, and A. Bagus Sriwarno, “Strategi Pengembangan Produk Terintegrasi Dan Modular (Ppt-M) Pada Litbang Desain Rantis Komodo Di Pt Pindad,” J. Sosioteknologi, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 106–123, 2016, doi: 10.5614/sostek.itbj.2016.15.1.10.
S. Hartati, A. Muhammad, K. Bayu, and M. Tasrif, “Indonesian Defense Industry Model Concept: A Study Framework for Defense Industry Building,” J. Adv. Manag. Sci., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 260–266, 2014, doi: 10.12720/joams.2.4.260-266.
Y. Bao, Z. Su, and C. H. Noble, “Determinants of new product development speed in China: A strategy tripod perspective,” Technovation, vol. 106, no. November 2019, p. 102291, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102291.
A. K. S. Fernando Situmeang, Imam Suyudi, “Strategy for the development of seaweed industry in Indonesia,” J. Def. Resour. Manag., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 44–50, 2020, doi: 10.5530/srp.2020.2.08.
P. Amelia, A. Lathifah, and I. N. A. Yasa, “Analysis of the impact of maritime sector development in supporting Indonesian Navy Ship operations,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 197, no. 2021, pp. 317–325, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.146.
J. P. Pramitha, M. S. Sugandi, and A. Putra, “Strategi Produk Pemasaran Produk Pertahanan dan Keamanan PT Pindad (Persero),” J. Penelit. Komun., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 195–210, 2019, doi: 10.20422/jpk.v22i2.673.
L. G. Vargas, Thomas L. Saaty, Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, vol. 175. London, 2012.
R. Mamola, C. Marsega, and W. Yulianti, “Strategi Pengembangan Wilayah Melalui Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dengan Pendekatan Sectoral Economic Analysis di Provinsi Banten,” Inpire J. Econ. Dev. Anal., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–46, 2021.
B. Cahyadi and A. Muzaqin, “Penerapan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Dalam Pemilihan Supplier Plating PT. X,” … Rekayasa dan Optimasi Sist. …, vol. 01, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://journal.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/jrosi/article/view/236.
