Evaluating Sustainability – Related KPIS in Public Construction Supply Chain : An Green SCOR – AHP- Based Analysis

Authors

  • Nazar Hadiwantoro Economics and Business Faculty, Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia
  • Rosalendro Eddy Nugroho Economics and Business Faculty, Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v6i4.515

Keywords:

Supply Chain, Sustainability, AHP, Green SCOR, Public Construction, SDG 12

Abstract

Public construction projects are increasingly required to integrate sustainability into supply chain performance, particularly in alignment with Sustainable Development Goal 12 on Responsible Consumption and Production. However, existing research often evaluates overall supply chain performance without prioritizing specific sustainability-related Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). This study addresses that gap by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to assess the relative importance of sustainability indicators within a public construction project in Indonesia.

Four KPIs were selected from the Green SCOR framework—supplier sustainability compliance, percentage of recycled materials used, waste reduction in construction, and energy consumption per unit of construction—based on their prominence in literature and validation through a focus group discussion with experts. Data were collected from 66 stakeholders, including owners, contractors, consultants, and suppliers.

The AHP results indicate that supplier sustainability compliance (0.401) is the most critical KPI, followed by recycled materials usage (0.268) and waste reduction (0.253), while energy consumption (0.077) ranked lowest. These findings reflect stakeholder emphasis on governance and circularity rather than technical efficiency, diverging from studies in developed countries where energy consumption is often prioritized.

This study contributes by refining Green SCOR applications in public construction, demonstrating the use of AHP for KPI prioritization, and providing practical recommendations for policymakers and project managers to embed sustainability into procurement and monitoring systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelgawad, M., & Fayek, A. R. (2010). Risk management in the construction industry using combined fuzzy FMEA and fuzzy AHP. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(9), 1028–1036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000210

Arditi, D., & Chotibhongs, R. (2005). Issues in subcontracting practice. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(8), 866–876. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:8(866)

Chen, X., Yang, H., Lu, W., & Xu, J. (2020). Sustainable construction: A review and future directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120701

Cheng, E. W. L., Li, H., & Yu, L. (2012). A GIS approach to support multi-criteria decision making for site selection of temporary housing after earthquakes. Automation in Construction, 20(5), 584–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.12.006

Ghosh, S., & Eriksson, P. E. (2022). Circular economy in construction: A systematic literature review. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 183, 106377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106377

Govindan, K., Kaliyan, M., Kannan, D., & Haq, A. N. (2018). Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.003

Kannan, D., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2019). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 640–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.049

Li, H., Zhu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2022). Sustainability indicators for construction supply chain management: A review and empirical study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 85, 104012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104012

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill.

Supply Chain Council. (2012). Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model. Supply Chain Council.

Supply Chain Council. (2017). Green SCOR framework. Supply Chain Council.

Vrijhoef, R., & Koskela, L. (2000). The four roles of supply chain management in construction. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6(3–4), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00013-7

Zhao, X., Hwang, B. G., & Lim, J. (2021). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124827

Published

2025-08-26

How to Cite

Hadiwantoro, N., & Nugroho, R. E. (2025). Evaluating Sustainability – Related KPIS in Public Construction Supply Chain : An Green SCOR – AHP- Based Analysis. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 6(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v6i4.515

Issue

Section

Articles